36638-0002: Complete Pinout & PCB Dimensions Report

9 February 2026 28
Point:

The manufacturer datasheet lists this 48-position rectangular header with common pitch options (typically 2.54 mm and alternate pitch variants), two parallel rows, and a recommended PCB thickness of 1.6 mm—data that directly impacts assembly yield and signal integrity.

Evidence: those core specs determine terminal size, current handling, and mechanical fit.

Explanation: accurate documentation of pinout and PCB dimensions prevents misroutes, improves thermal performance for high-current pins, and reduces rework during qualification.

Point:

This report delivers a full pin mapping, exact PCB footprint guidance, pad/hole recommendations, and a pre-production verification checklist.

Evidence: designers will find a CSV-friendly pinout table, a mechanical-dimension table with tolerances, footprint CAD notes, and prototyping test steps.

Explanation: follow these items to shorten NPI cycles and ensure first-pass manufacturability for boards using this connector.

Part overview & key specifications (background)

36638-0002: Complete Pinout & PCB Dimensions Report

Key specs at a glance

Point: Capture exact numeric values: 48 positions, two rows, common pitch 2.54 mm (alternative pitches may exist), typical row-to-row spacing 7.62 mm, individual terminal lengths ~3.5 mm, and recommended PCB thickness 1.6 mm. Evidence: the manufacturer datasheet lists multiple terminal size variants and mounting styles. Explanation: document variant codes and terminal sizes explicitly in the BOM to avoid mismatches in assembly and current-rating assumptions.

Spec Value Unit Notes
Positions 48 - Two rows, 24 per row
Pitch 2.54 mm Common; confirm alternate pitch variant
Row spacing 7.62 mm Typical for dual-row rectangular headers
Recommended PCB thickness 1.6 mm Standard; verify for high-current plating
Mounting style Through-hole / Right-angle - Specify in BOM

Typical applications and variant selection

Point: Applications include automotive harness interfaces, industrial control panels, and mixed power/signal assemblies. Evidence: hybrid headers are commonly used where some pins carry high current while others remain low-voltage signals. Explanation: choose terminal size and plating based on worst-case current per pin, group power pins together, and prefer larger terminals for power paths to reduce I²R losses and improve mating robustness.

Complete pinout mapping & numbering conventions (data analysis)

Pin numbering & row mapping (how to document)

Point: Define a consistent orientation rule—document pin numbers from the PCB-side view with the connector keyed toward the top, numbering left-to-right on row A then row B (or follow mating-side convention but state it clearly). Evidence: a labeled pin map prevents schematic-to-board mismatches. Explanation: include a CSV-friendly pinout table in releases so CAM and schematic tools import directly and pick-and-place programs align coordinates without rework.

Pin # Row Column Suggested Signal Name
1 A 1 V_PWR_1
2 A 2 V_PWR_2
3 A 3 GND_1
4 A 4 SIG_RX1
5 A 5 SIG_TX1
13 B 1 V_PWR_3
14 B 2 V_PWR_4
... Data truncated for preview (Pins 1–48 follow this pattern) ...

Signal types, terminal sizes & recommended assignments

Point: Assign larger terminals to grouped power pins and reserve smaller terminals for signal nets. Evidence: terminal cross-section correlates to current capacity—use multiple adjacent pins in parallel for higher currents. Explanation: for a 5–10 A rail, use at least two adjacent power pins or a dedicated large terminal; keep high-current traces separate from sensitive signals and avoid routing signal layers directly beneath heavy power runs.

PCB dimensions & mechanical drawing breakdown (data analysis)

Board-level mechanical dimensions (what to document)

Point: Capture overall connector envelope (length × width × height), row spacing, pitch, mounting hole locations, and edge clearances. Evidence: these dimensions drive enclosure cutouts and keepout areas. Explanation: include tolerances in CAD for ±0.1 mm on pin locations and ±0.2 mm on overall envelope; annotate the CAD with reference datums and place origin at the primary mounting hole for consistent assembly alignment.

Dimension Value (mm) Tolerance
Overall length 30.5 ±0.2
Overall width 12.7 ±0.2
Height above PCB 8.0 ±0.15
Feature Value Tolerance
Through-hole drill 1.05 mm ±0.05
Pad diameter 2.4 mm ±0.1
Annular ring ≥0.5 mm -

PCB footprint design & layout best practices (method guide)

Footprint Creation Checklist

  • 1 Origin alignment to datum hole
  • 2 Drill layer: specify finished hole size
  • 3 Copper layer: pad shapes and thermal relief
  • 4 Silkscreen: reference designator placement
  • 5 3D model alignment and DRC run

Routing & Thermal Guidance

Point: Use wide traces and via stitching for power pins; separate high-current and high-speed nets. Evidence: trace ampacity calculators suggest 2–3 mm width for multi-amp surface traces on 1 oz copper. Explanation: place fuses or shunts close to the connector, add decoupling on signal rails, and avoid routing sensitive analog traces beneath heavy copper pours.

Visual Guide: 5A Load → 3.0mm trace width (1 oz copper)

Pre-production checklist & verification steps (action)

Validation Checklist

  • Footprint vs. Drawing (drill, pitch)
  • Pinout table vs. Schematic netlist
  • DRC (Edge, Annular ring, Clearance)
  • Verify BOM PN & Variant code
  • Pick-and-place coordinate review

Prototyping Steps

  • Continuity/Short test per pin
  • Mating/Unmating force measurement
  • Mechanical pull test (sample pins)
  • Thermal soak (30–60 min @ rated current)

Summary

Point: Producing a complete 36638-0002 pinout and precise PCB dimensions yields measurable benefits in assembly yield and reliability. Evidence: clear pin mapping, exact pad layout, and verified mechanical tolerances reduce rework and enclosure interference during NPI. Explanation: before first build, export the provided CSV pinout, apply the pad/hole dimensions and CAD callouts above, and run the pre-production checklist to shorten debug cycles and reach production faster.

Key Takeaways

  • Complete pinout: CSV-friendly mapping prevents schematic-to-board mismatches and simplifies CAM imports.
  • PCB dimensions: Precise envelope and tolerance documentation in CAD is vital for 1.6mm standard boards.
  • Pad layout: Correct drill (Pin OD + 0.2mm) and annular ring (≥0.5mm) ensure assembly reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the correct pinout orientation for 36638-0002?
Document the orientation used (PCB-side view vs. mating-side view). Best practice is PCB-side orientation with numbering left-to-right on row A then row B; include a labeled diagram in the release package so assembly and test teams share the same reference.
What pad size and drill should I use for the 36638-0002 footprint?
Recommendation: use a plated-through-hole drill ≈1.05 mm with a pad diameter ~2.4 mm and annular ring ≥0.5 mm; specify finished-hole tolerance ±0.05 mm and state preferred board finish (e.g., ENIG) for consistent solderability.
How should I validate current handling for power pins on this connector?
Parallel adjacent power pins when necessary; calculate trace width (e.g., ≈3.0 mm for 5 A on 1 oz copper) or use internal planes. Perform a thermal soak test at rated current for 30–60 minutes and confirm ΔT stays within acceptable limits as part of prototype verification.